Can you imagine unearthing a treasure trove from a bygone era right in
your backyard? That's precisely the thrilling premise of "The Dig" by
John Preston, which re-imagines the real-life discovery at Sutton Hoo. Join
me, Lluvia, as I dissect both the book and its 2021 film adaptation
starring Carey Mulligan and Ralph Fiennes. This episode dives deep into
the heart of the Sutton Hoo excavation, exploring the historical context
and real-life controversies. I also tackle the contentious casting
choices, particularly my disappointment with Carey Mulligan's portrayal
of Edith Pretty, a role that should have showcased an older actress. My
critique extends to Mulligan's history of appropriating roles meant for
Latina actresses, emphasizing the dire need for better representation in
Hollywood.
The book "The Dig" by John Preston was first
published in 2007 and is a historical fiction retelling of the events
surrounding the Sutton Hoo archaeological find in 1939. This excavation
unearthed one of the most significant Anglo-Saxon treasures in England.
Edith Pretty, a widowed farmer, hires Basil Brown, an amateur
archaeologist, to investigate the mysterious mounds on her property,
leading to a series of dramatic discoveries and legal battles over
ownership of the artifacts.
In contrast, the 2021 film adaptation
of "The Dig," starring Carey Mulligan and Ralph Fiennes, adds its
unique elements to the story. Notably, the film includes scenes absent
from the book, such as Robert's poignant conversation with his mother
about her mortality and a dramatic plane crash near Edith's property.
These additions serve to heighten the emotional stakes and create a more
engaging narrative for the audience.
However, one of the most
significant points of discussion in this episode is the casting of Carey
Mulligan as Edith Pretty. In the book, Edith is depicted as a woman in
her fifties, whose age and health issues play a crucial role in the
story. Mulligan, being in her thirties at the time of filming, does not
align with this portrayal, leading to a critique of ageism in Hollywood.
This casting choice is particularly frustrating as it overlooks the
opportunity for an older actress to take on a substantial role.
Furthermore,
Mulligan's history of taking roles meant for Latina actresses is also
addressed. Representation in Hollywood remains a critical issue, and the
casting of white actors in roles meant for people of color only
exacerbates the problem. The importance of providing opportunities for
underrepresented groups cannot be overstated, and this critique
underscores the need for more thoughtful casting decisions in the
industry.
Moving on, the film adaptation of "The Dig" also
differs from the book in its portrayal of certain characters and events.
For instance, the character of Stuart Piggott is depicted as a closeted
gay man in the film, a detail not explicitly mentioned in the book.
This creative liberty adds a layer of complexity to the character's
relationship with his wife, Peggy, and highlights the social constraints
of the time.
Additionally, the film focuses more narrowly on the
events at Sutton Hoo, whereas the book includes scenes outside of this
setting, such as Edith's trips to London. These differences in scope and
focus between the two mediums provide a richer understanding of the
historical context and the characters involved.
The episode also
delves into the legal battle over the ownership of the archaeological
treasures found at Sutton Hoo. In the book, this battle is a significant
plot point, highlighting the tension between personal property rights
and national heritage. The film, however, simplifies this aspect, with
the British Museum's claim to the artifacts being less contentious.
In
conclusion, while both the book and the film offer unique perspectives
on the Sutton Hoo excavation, neither medium is deemed superior. The
film is noted for its more engaging narrative, thanks to the added
emotional scenes and dramatic events. However, the book provides a
broader context and more detailed character development.
Join the
conversation as I navigate the complexities and nuances of adapting
historical fiction for the silver screen. Whether you prefer the book or
the film, "The Dig" offers a fascinating glimpse into a significant
historical event and raises important questions about representation and
storytelling in Hollywood.
Wednesday, June 19, 2024
Books vs. Movies: The Dig
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment